comparison of different methods of femoral fixation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors

alireza eajazi akhtar orthopedic research center, akhtar orthopedic hospital, shahid beheshti medical university, tehran, iran.

firooz madadi department of orthopedic surgery, akhtar orthopedic hospital, shahid beheshti medical university, tehran, iran.

firoozeh madadi department of medicine, shahid beheshti medical university, tehran, iran.

majid boreiri department of medicine, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

abstract

the aim of this study is to compare three modes of femoral fixation, namely aperfix, rigidfix and endobutton, in anterior cruciate ligament (acl) reconstruction. 120 patients were randomly assigned to three groups, each consisting of 40 patients, and each group was treated by one of the above mentioned methods of femoral fixation. all patients were examined prior to and 24 months after surgery, and they were compared for anterior tibial displacement using the lysholm score and kt-1000. the three modes of femoral fixation were not significantly different in terms of time of surgery. in the endobutton group, the lysholm score rose from 63.21±18.59 prior to acl reconstruction to 90.64±9.47 after the surgery, while it rose from 65.72±18.74 to 96.22±5.35 in the aperfix group and from 69.21±17.45 to 90.64±9.47 in the rigidfix group. anterior tibial displacement was 3.96±1.58 mm for endobutton, 4.28±1.48 mm for rigidfix and 4.03±1.79 mm for aperfix. aperfix was indicated to yield a better outcome in terms of instant stability and general results.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Comparison of different methods of femoral fixation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The aim of this study is to compare three modes of femoral fixation, namely Aperfix, Rigidfix and Endobutton, in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. 120 patients were randomly assigned to three groups, each consisting of 40 patients, and each group was treated by one of the above mentioned methods of femoral fixation. All patients were examined prior to and 24 months after surgery,...

full text

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Different Femoral Tunnel Positions after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

Background: It has been shown that the proper placement of ACL graft during the ACL reconstruction surgery significantly improves the clinical outcomes. This study investigated whether a change in the femoral tunnel position in both axial and coronal planes can significantly alter the postoperative functional and clinical outcomes of the patients. Methods: This comparative, retrospective, singl...

full text

Femoral Condyle Fracture during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Dear Editor,We have greatly enjoyed reading the case report entitled “‘Femoral Condyle Fracture during Revision of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Case Report and a Review of Literature in the issue of Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3(2) with great interest. We would like to commend the authors for their detailed and valuable work. Although various case reports have described postoperative ...

full text

Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

  The present review classifies and describes the multifactorial causes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery failure, concentrating on preventing and resolving such situations. The article particularly focuses on those causes that require ACL revision due to recurrent instability, without neglecting those that affect function or produce persistent pain. Although primary ACL reconstructio...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
acta medica iranica

جلد ۵۱، شماره ۷، صفحات ۴۴۴-۴۴۸

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023